[:en]The Québec Superior Court determined that the true nature of a dispute covered by the litigation was over the manner in which the government imposed the contract on the litigants and not over its interpretation or application. Corporation des services d’ambulance du Québec v. Barette (Ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux), 2017 QCCS 4170 serves as a caution that even the most elaborate undertakings to arbitrate do not necessarily apply if the dispute is not about the contract between the parties but with the government as a third party which created it. Continue reading “[:en]Québec – court declines request to refer parties to arbitration disputing validity of government decision to impose standard contract – #017[:]”
[:en]P.E.I. – legislation imposes arbitration before a judge in order to resolve disputes over compensation owing from expropriation – #016[:]
[:en]Unlike most other court decisions in which litigants apply to a judge to send the parties to arbitration or to review an arbitral award, the judge in Haras Management et al. v. Gov. of P.E.I., 2017 PESC 14 was appointed by provincial legislation to sit as an arbitrator to resolve the parties’ dispute and her award was subject to the province’s Arbitration Act, RSPEI 1988, c A-16. Continue reading “[:en]P.E.I. – legislation imposes arbitration before a judge in order to resolve disputes over compensation owing from expropriation – #016[:]”
[:en]Northwest Territories – Court of Appeal applies ‘pith and substance’ analysis to enforce original undertaking to arbitrate – #015[:]
[:en]The Northwest Territories’ Court of Appeal in Miller Sales et al v. Metso Minerals et al, 2017 NWTCA 3 granted an application to stay under section of NWT’s International Commercial Arbitration Act, RSNWT 1988, c I-6 (“ICAA”) . In doing so, it upheld the reasoning and result in the chambers judge’s decision, reported in Miller Sales & Engineering Inc. et al. v. Metso Minerals Industries Inc. et al., 2016 NWTSC 23, which looked past the terms of a settlement and assignment agreement and enforced the parties’ initial undertaking to arbitrate. Continue reading “[:en]Northwest Territories – Court of Appeal applies ‘pith and substance’ analysis to enforce original undertaking to arbitrate – #015[:]”
[:en]Ontario – court obliges plaintiff to complete legislated mediation and arbitration steps before having access to court – #014[:]
[:en]Ontario’s Superior Court dismissed litigation in favour of statute-ordered mediation and arbitration because those two steps were necessary but unmet preconditions to court access. Peel Condo Corp 166 v. Ohri, 2017 ONSC 6438 determined that each of those steps had neither been attempted by Plaintiff nor waived by Defendant. The case illustrates how some legislation can impose alternative dispute resolution steps onto some legal relationships, created by contract, which the parties must attempt before filing litigation. Continue reading “[:en]Ontario – court obliges plaintiff to complete legislated mediation and arbitration steps before having access to court – #014[:]”
[:en]Federal – Court of Appeal quashes garnishment attempt executing arbitral award against third parties – #013[:]
[:en]In a pair of decisions, the Federal Court of Appeal reminded litigants of the limits of enforcing arbitral awards. In Delizia Limited v. Nevsun Resources Ltd., 2017 FCA 187 and Delizia Limited v. Sunridge Gold Corp., 2017 FCA 188 the court upheld two corresponding lower court decisions, Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Delizia Limited, 2016 FC 393 and Sunridge Gold Corp. v. Delizia Limited, 2016 FC 392, which overturned a Prothonotary’s order of garnishment against non-parties to the arbitration, Delizia Limited v. Eritrea, 2015 FC 33 and Delizia Limited v. Eritrea, 2015 FC 34, when doing so would require the court to pierce multiple corporate veils on the basis of the debtor’s control over them. Continue reading “[:en]Federal – Court of Appeal quashes garnishment attempt executing arbitral award against third parties – #013[:]”
[:en]Ontario – court enforces post-dispute submission agreement to override earlier arbitration agreement and quash appeal attempt – #012[:]
[:en]In Swift v Allied Track Services, 2017 ONSC 6514, the Ontario Superior Court granted a motion to quash an attempted appeal from a final arbitral award. The court determined that a submission agreement, negotiated by the parties after their disputes had arisen, had overtaken their earlier arbitration agreement and provided no right of appeal without leave. Continue reading “[:en]Ontario – court enforces post-dispute submission agreement to override earlier arbitration agreement and quash appeal attempt – #012[:]”
[:en]Manitoba – court uses res judicata and abuse of procedure principles to pre-empt appeal of arbitral award – #011[:]
[:en]Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench relied on the principle of res judicata and the control’s inherent powers to control for abuse of its procedure to deny 3 grounds for leave to appeal application in Broadband Communications North Inc. v. I-Netlink Incorporated, 2017 MBQB 146. Mr. Justice James G. Edmond did allow a limited number of grounds to go forward as those few did qualify under Manitoba’s The Arbitration Act, CCSM, c A120. Continue reading “[:en]Manitoba – court uses res judicata and abuse of procedure principles to pre-empt appeal of arbitral award – #011[:]”
[:en]Saskatchewan – court’s narrow interpretation of its authority to review widens arbitrator’s autonomy to manage arbitral process – #010[:]
[:en]
Adopting a narrow interpretation of its supervisory role granted by Saskatchewan’s The Arbitration Act, 1992, SS 1992, c A-24.1., Saskatchewan’s Court of Queen’s Bench dismissed an application to review an arbitrator’s decision because the court’s jurisdiction had not been triggered. The court in Government of Saskatchewan v Capitol Steel Corporation, 2017 SKQB 302 decided that it could only intervene if the arbitral ruling actually qualified as either one of two types of arbitral results listed for review in the legislation. Continue reading “[:en]Saskatchewan – court’s narrow interpretation of its authority to review widens arbitrator’s autonomy to manage arbitral process – #010[:]”
[:en]Québec – court authorizes defendant to apply outside delay for referral to arbitration – #009[:]
[:en]Mandatory wording in Québec’s Code of Civil Procedure, CQLR c C-25.01 does not prevent a litigant from demanding a stay of court proceedings and referral to arbitration beyond a time limit set by the rules. The Québec court in Ferme Cérélait inc. v. Ferme Roch Vincent inc., 2017 QCCS 3260 granted an application which was outside a clear but not strict time limit. Continue reading “[:en]Québec – court authorizes defendant to apply outside delay for referral to arbitration – #009[:]”
[:en]Ontario – proof of concept for merchants opting for international commercial arbitration – #008[:]
[:en]
In a brisk decision granting recognition and enforcement an arbitral award made in Stockholm, Ontario’s Superior Court demonstrated Ontario’s commitment to international commercial arbitration. The November 1, 2017 decision in Profoto AB v. Blazes Photographic, 2017 ONSC 6455 sends a reassuring message to international traders that Ontario is arbitration-friendly even when the final award is unfavourable to the Ontario-based litigant. Continue reading “[:en]Ontario – proof of concept for merchants opting for international commercial arbitration – #008[:]”