Rather than picking a specific case for a Holiday Hash-over I’ve opted for a broader theme: since arbitration is contractual, to what extent do/should the principles set out in the SCC’s 2014 decision in Bhasin v. Hrynew 2014 SCC 71 (“Bhasin”) and its descendants apply to a Canadian domestic arbitration and what practical difference might it make?
Continue reading “Jim’s 2024 Hot Topic – The duty of good faith in domestic arbitration – #885”Josh’s 2024 Hot Topic – Consensual arbitration appeal mechanisms – #884
This year, in a landmark decision, McLaren Automotive Incorporated c.9727272 Canada Inc, 2024 QCCS 3457, the Québec Superior Court rendered a first-ever ruling that considered the validity of an arbitration appeal mechanism whereby the parties’ arbitration agreement allowed the appeal of an award to a different arbitrator. As reported in Arbitration Matters case note no. 864 (“Parties May Agree Upon an Arbitral Mechanism”), the Court found that such a mechanism does not offend public order principles set out in art. 622(3) of the Québec Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”). Therefore, it found that Québec law does not prevent the parties from agreeing to an appeal mechanism in their arbitration agreement, even though it is not provided for in Québec arbitration law, which is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law.
Continue reading “Josh’s 2024 Hot Topic – Consensual arbitration appeal mechanisms – #884”Julie’s 2024 Hot Topic – Exceptions to Competence-Competence Litigated in Appellate Courts in 2024 – #883
In 2024, for the first time, two appeal courts considered the “brick wall” exception to competence-competence set out in Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16 (“Uber”).
Continue reading “Julie’s 2024 Hot Topic – Exceptions to Competence-Competence Litigated in Appellate Courts in 2024 – #883”