Skip to content

Arbitration Matters

notes on new arbitration cases in Canada

  • Case Notes
  • Our Team
  • Subscribe to Updates
  • CONTACT LISA

Search Results for: Vavilov

Posted on October 13, 2020April 24, 2021

Federal – appointing authority’s breach of appointment provisions raise no reasonable apprehension of bias – #382

…Pacific Railway Company v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69 (CanLII), [2019] 1 FCR 121 and Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65.  Citing Vavilov para….

Posted on June 6, 2021

Ontario – correctness standard applies on appeal of arbitration award under contract prescribed by statute – #494

…1998, SO 1998, c 19.Ramsay J. observed that neither party argued Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 and she accepted the guidance set out in…

Posted on March 15, 2022May 4, 2022

Saskatchewan – Judicial review available only when arbitration agreement provides – #594

…found that this was not a matter for review under s. 46 (1). In any event, citing Canada v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 for the proposition that “a reasonable decision…

Posted on November 5, 2020

Québec – use of ‘arbitration’ to label administrative proceeding no substitute for consent to statutory arbitration – #387

…Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 Yergeau J. determined that the decision was reasonable and intervention was unwarranted. Ville de Saint-Colomban (“Saint-Colomban”) and Ville de Saint Jérôme (“Saint-Jérôme”) disputed overlapping…

Posted on October 15, 2021May 4, 2022

Ontario – Challenge to arbitrator’s integrity to be determined using bias test – #543

…a critical issue, then it may conclude that the deficiency constitutes an error in law.  See R. v. R.E.M. ¶ 52-57. [116] See also Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 ¶ 79-91”….

Posted on February 11, 2022May 4, 2022

Alberta –No appeal of decision refusing leave to appeal arbitration award, despite s. 48 of Alberta Arbitration Act – #583

…… [69] Finally, the Tenant argues that Sherwin-Williams failed to consider the important error-correcting and law-settling functions of this Court. It says Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov,…

Posted on December 27, 2019January 3, 2021

Saskatchewan – arbitral board created by statute subject to access to information legislation procedures – #250

…of Canada in reasons articulated in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 and application illustrated in Bell Canada v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 66….

Posted on July 22, 2021May 4, 2022

Québec – No bias where arbitrator rejected most objections by a party, had little interest in some evidence, questioned witnesses, and showed irritation at party – #511

…the arbitrator’s award was reasonableness, applying Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65. He held that the arbitrator’s award with respect to grounds (i) to (iv)…

Posted on February 16, 2022May 4, 2022

Ontario – Court overturns decision, “deciding the matter” of jurisdiction de novo – #586

…governed by the principles of judicial review set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov”. He stated clearly that neither administrative…

Posted on February 11, 2021

P.E.I. – set aside application invoking arbitral misconduct is neither a judicial review nor an appeal – #422

…13:35-13:36)”. Landlord sought support from Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 para. 77 and Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699…

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 … Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Next page

About Arbitration Matters

Arbitration Matters provides brief summaries of recent cases on commercial arbitration issues, as they are released, from across Canada. Therefore, the website is updated frequently. Each Case Note also provides commentary which helps put the case in context. As of Case Note #509 dated July 26, 2021, Lisa C. Munro, has continued the work done by the Honourable Justice Daniel Urbas before his judicial appointment to the Quebec Superior Court. She is assisted by a select group of other experienced arbitration practitioners, who also contribute regularly to the Case Notes.

Biweekly Case Notes Newsletter

Connect with Lisa

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Arbitration Case Notes
  • Our Team
  • Case Updates in your Inbox
  • Arbitration Bootcamp (YouTube)

About Arbitration Matters

Arbitration Matters provides brief summaries of recent cases on commercial arbitration issues, as they are released, from across Canada. Each Case Note provides commentary which helps put the case in context. Any commentary by the Contributor reflects solely the views of that Contributor and does not reflect the views of the Editor or Arbitration Matters.

Edited by: Lisa C Munro

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Proudly powered by WordPress