notes on new arbitration cases in Canada
…its decision before the Supreme Court of Canada came out with its landmark decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 [Vavilov]. Depending on who…
…“leading authority on the applicable standard of review”. Despite the mention of the second, companion case, Edmond J. restricted subsequent references to Vavilov. Edmond J. set out the guidance Vavilov…
…suddenly presents an evidentiary record that was not before the decision maker”. (c) Vavilov – Joyal C.J. dutifully set out the competing lines of responses to Vavilov but decided not…
…see “Ontario – Vavilov does not overrule Teal Cedar or Sattva Capital – #302”. Mr. Justice Glenn A. Hainey held that Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019…
…2021: what is Vavilov’s impact on commercial arbitration appeals? Although on its own Spirit Bay is not the most significant case of the year, the impact of the Vavilov on…
…effect of Vavilov – Justice Marion noted that the Supreme Court of Canada did not specifically address statutory arbitration appeals in Vavilov, but stated that there was, “no convincing reason…
…for leave to appeal, in which it held that the correctness standard of appeal in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 (“Vavilov”) applies to review…
…(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65. Residents in Nevada, Petitioners had each signed an employment agreement with Octaform Inc. (“Octaform”) governed by Nevada law and subject…
…does not apply to one of them and (ii) why apply the standard of review applicable to statutory arbitrations, recently restated in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov,…
…of Canada’s decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 (“Vavilov”) – and case law in 2023 did not resolve this discussion. In the post-Vavilov…